4.7 Article

Framework based on number of basis functions complexity measure in investigation of the power characteristics of direct methanol fuel cell

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.03.025

关键词

Direct methanol fuel cell; DFMC; Fuel cell performance; Power characteristics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A potential alternative to cell batteries is the air-breathing micro direct methanol fuel cell (pDMFC) because it is environmental friendly, charging-free, possesses high energy density properties and provides easy storage of the fuel. The effective functioning of the complex air-breathing pDMFC system exhibits higher dependence on its operating conditions and the parameters. The main challenge for the experts is to determine its optimum operating conditions. In this context, the mathematical modeling approach based on evolutionary framework of genetic programming (GP) can be applied. However, its successful implementation depends on the complexity chosen in its structural risk minimization (SRM) objective function. In this work, the two measures of complexity based on the standardized number of nodes and the number of basis functions in the splines is chosen. Comparison between the two GP approaches based on these two complexity measures is evaluated on the experimental procedure performed on the mu DMFC. The power characteristics considered in this study are power density and open-circuit voltage and the three inputs considered are methanol flow rate, methanol concentration and the cell temperature. The statistical analysis based on cross-validation, error metrics and hypothesis tests is performed to choose the best GP based power characteristics models. Further, 2-D plots for measuring the individual effects and the 3-D plots for the interaction effects of the inputs on the power characteristics is plotted based on the parametric approach. It was found that the methanol concentration influences the power characteristics (power density and OCV) of mu DMFC the most followed by cell temperature and methanol flow rate. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据