4.7 Article

Fully Productive Cell-Free Genetic Code Expansion by Structure-Based Engineering of Methanomethylophilus alvus Pyrrolysyl-tRNA Synthetase

期刊

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 718-732

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00288

关键词

cell-free protein synthesis; non-canonical amino acid; pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase; Methanomethylophilus alvus; structure-based protein engineering; Herceptin-Fab

资金

  1. Platform Project for Supporting Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (Basis for Supporting Innovative Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (BINDS)) from AMED [JP17am0101081]
  2. Leading Advanced Projects for Medical Innovation (LEAP) from AMED [JP19gm0010001]
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. MEXT [16K05859, 24550203]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24550203, 16K05859] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase (PylRS)/tRNA(Pyl) pairs from Methanosarcina mazei and Methanosarcina barkeri are widely used for site-specific incorporations of non-canonical amino acids into proteins (genetic code expansion). In this study, we achieved the full productivity of cell-free protein synthesis for difficult, bulky non-canonical amino acids, such as Ne-epsilon-((((E)-cyclooct-2-en-1-yl)oxy)carbonyl)-L-lysine (TCO*Lys), by using Methanomethylophilus alvus PylRS. First, based on the crystal structure of M. alvus PylRS, the productivities for various non-canonical amino acids were greatly increased by rational engineering of the amino acid-binding pocket. The productivities were further enhanced by using a much higher concentration of PylRS over that of M. mazei PylRS, or by mutating the outer layer of the amino acid-binding pocket. Thus, we achieved full productivity even for TCO*Lys. The quantity and quality of the cell-free-produced antibody fragment containing TCO*Lys were drastically improved. These results demonstrate the importance of full productivity for the expanded genetic code.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据