4.7 Article

Inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase II (INPP4B) is associated with chemoresistance and poor outcome in AML

期刊

BLOOD
卷 125, 期 18, 页码 2815-2824

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-09-603555

关键词

-

资金

  1. Leukemia Foundation
  2. Victorian Cancer Agency
  3. Arrow Bone Marrow Transplant Foundation
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphoinositide signalingregulates diverse cellular functions. Phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) generates PtdIns(3,4,5) P-3 and PtdIns(3,4) P-2, leading to the activation of proliferative and anti-apoptotic signaling pathways. Termination of phosphoinositide signaling requires hydrolysis of inositol ring phosphate groups through the actions of PtdIns(3,4,5) P-3 3-phosphatase (PTEN), PtdIns(3,4,5) P-3 5-phosphatases (eg, SHIP), and PtdIns(3,4) P-2 4-phosphatases (eg, INPP4B). The biological relevance of most of these phosphoinositide phosphatases in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains poorly understood. Mass spectrometry-based gene expression profiling of 3-, 4-and 5-phosphatases in human AML revealed significant overexpression of INPP4B. Analysis of an expanded panel of 205 AML cases at diagnosis revealed INPP4B overexpression in association with reduced responses to chemotherapy, early relapse, and poor overall survival, independent of other risk factors. Ectopic overexpression of INPP4B conferred leukemic resistance to cytosine arabinoside (ara-C), daunorubicin, and etoposide. Expression of a phosphatase inert variant (INPP4B C842A) failed to abrogate resistance of AML cells to chemotherapy in vitro or in vivo. In contrast, targeted suppression of endogenously overexpressed INPP4B by RNA interference sensitized AML cell lines and primary AML to chemotherapy. These findings demonstrate a previously unsuspected and clinically relevant role for INPP4B gain of function as a mediator of chemoresistance and poor survival outcome in AML independent of its phosphoinositide phosphatase function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据