4.7 Article

Study on the experimental performance by electrolysis-integrated ecological floating bed for nitrogen and phosphorus removal in eutrophic water

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64499-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51908277]
  2. Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [BK20190320]
  3. Environmental Protection Science and Technology Project of Department of Ecology and Environment of Jiangsu Province [2018009]
  4. National Water Pollution Control and Treatment Science and Technology Major Project [2017ZX07204002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The new-type electrolysis-integrated ecological floating beds (EEFBs) were set up to study their water removal ability due to the excellent water treatment capacity of electrolysis, this enhanced EEFBs were made of polyethylene filled with biochar substrate and in middle of the substrate placed the Mg-Al alloy served as anode and graphite served as cathode. The results show that removal rates of total nitrogen (TN), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), total phosphorus (TP) and phosphate (PO43--P) by the EEFBs increased 53.1%, 96.5%, 76.5% and 74.5%, respectively. The electrolysis reaction was the main pathway for TN and TP removals in the EEFBs. A higher concentration of hydrogen autotrophic denitrification bacteria was recorded in the substrate of the EEFBs than that in the traditional ecological floating beds (EFBs) (p<0.05), suggesting that the electrolysis may have enhanced the NO3--N removal efficiency of the EEFBs by promoting the growth and reproduce of hydrogen autotrophic denitrification bacteria. The in-situ formation of Mg2+ and Al3+ ions from a sacrificial Mg-Al alloy anode, caused PO43--P and other suspended matter flocculation, improved phosphorus removal and simultaneously reduced turbidity. Thus, electrolysis-integrated ecological floating bed has high nitrogen and phosphorus removal potential in eutrophic water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据