4.7 Article

DNA methylation and gene expression signatures are associated with ataxia-telangiectasia phenotype

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64514-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. A-T Children's Project
  2. NIH/NHLBI [R01HL114800, K08HL146943, K08HL128867, R01HL149883]
  3. Parker B. Francis Fellowship
  4. ATS Foundation/Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. Research Fellowship in IPF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

People with ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) display phenotypic variability with regard to progression of immunodeficiency, sino-pulmonary disease, and neurologic decline. To determine the association between differential gene expression, epigenetic state, and phenotypic variation among people with A-T, we performed transcriptional and genome-wide DNA methylation profiling in patients with mild and classic A-T progression as well as healthy controls. RNA and genomic DNA were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells for transcriptional and DNA methylation profiling with RNA-sequencing and modified reduced representation bisulfite sequencing, respectively. We identified 555 genes that were differentially expressed among the control, mild A-T, and classic A-T groups. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling revealed differential promoter methylation in cis with 146 of these differentially expressed genes. Functional enrichment analysis identified significant enrichment in immune, growth, and apoptotic pathways among the methylation-regulated genes. Regardless of clinical phenotype, all A-T participants exhibited downregulation of critical genes involved in B cell function (PAX5, CD79A, CD22, and FCRL1) and upregulation of several genes associated with senescence and malignancy, including SERPINE1. These findings indicate that gene expression differences may be associated with phenotypic variability and suggest that DNA methylation regulates expression of critical immune response genes in people with A-T.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据