4.7 Article

Preparation of high drug-loading celastrol nanosuspensions and their anti-breast cancer activities in vitro and in vivo

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65773-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC-Guangdong Joint Foundation [U1401223]
  2. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences [2016-I2M-1-012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As one of the main components of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F, celastrol (CSL) has significant antitumor activity, but its clinical application has been limited by its poor solubility, low oral bioavailability and systemic toxicity. In this study, celastrol nanosuspensions (CSL-NSps) were prepared using an antisolvent precipitation method with poloxamer 188 (P-188) as a stabilizer at a high CSL/P-188 feeding ratio of 8:1. The resultant CSL was spherical in shape with an average particle size of 147.9 nm, a polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.12 and zeta potential of -19.2 mV. The encapsulation efficiency and drug loading content were 98.18% and 86.83%, respectively, and the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern showed that CSL existed in an amorphous state in the nanosuspensions. CSL-NSps were quite stable in various physiological media and plasma and were both suitable for oral and intravenous administration. Nanosuspensions greatly enhanced the in vitro dissolution, and the cumulative drug release reached approximately 69.20% within 48 h. In vivo, CSL-NSps (3 mg/kg, i.g.) displayed a significantly enhanced tumor inhibition rate (TIR) in comparison with that of CSL suspension when administered orally (TIR, 50.39%, vs. 41.16%, p < 0.05), similar to that of PTX injection (8 mg/kg, i.v. TIR, 50.88%). CSL-NSps showed even better therapeutic efficacy than PTX injection (TIR, 64.18%, p < 0.01) when intravenously injected. This has demonstrated that, with the help of nanosuspensions, CSL is likely to be an effective and promising antitumor agent in clinic practice for the treatment of breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据