3.9 Review

Immunoscore and its introduction in clinical practice

出版社

EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
DOI: 10.23736/S1824-4785.20.03249-5

关键词

Colonic neoplasms; Neoplasm staging; Prognosis; Biomarkers; Immune system

资金

  1. INSERM
  2. National Cancer Institute of France (INCa)
  3. Canceropole Ile de France
  4. La Ligue Contre le Cancer
  5. ERAnet Transcan
  6. Fondation ARC
  7. Cancer Research for Personalized Medicine (CARPEM)
  8. Paris Alliance of Cancer Research Institutes (PACRI)
  9. LabEx Immuno-oncology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current cancer classification is based on intrinsic tumor parameters such as characteristic of tumor cells, tumor progression. tumor invasion and the presence of distant metastases, as summarized by the AJCC/UICC-TNM stratification system. There is currently no immune-based classification of cancer. We provided evidence that the immune contexture, as defined by the type, density, functional immune orientation and the location of immune cells within tumor, strongly influences the outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. To translate this information to the clinic, we developed an immunohistochemistry and digital pathology-based assay named Immunoscore that allows the quantification of two T cell subsets (CD3 and CD8) in two tumor regions (core and invasive margin of tumors). We have demonstrated that the standardized consensus Immunoscore has a prognostic value superior and independent to the one of the traditional TNM system in an international study in stage I-III colon cancer patients, therefore validating the Immunoscore as the first immune-based scoring system. In additional analyses, we showed the prognostic value of Immunoscore for stage II-IV CRC patients, as well as the predictive value of Immunoscore in stage III colon cancer patients. The Immunoscore may help predict and stratify patients who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Moreover, the Immunoscore allows the classification of tumors from hot to cold categories, and could consequently guide clinical decision for the choice of treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据