4.6 Article

Redox-Active Tetraruthenium Macrocycles Built from 1,4-Divinylphenylene-Bridged Diruthenium Complexes

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 28, 页码 9574-9590

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201601384

关键词

(spectro)electrochemistry; density functional calculations; electrochromism; metallamacrocycle; paramagnetism

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) through Collaborative Research Center [(SFB) 767]
  2. Carl-Zeiss Foundation
  3. bwHPC program
  4. JUSTUS HPC facility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metallamacrocylic tetraruthenium complexes were generated by treatment of 1,4-divinylphenylene-bridged diruthenium complexes with functionalized 1,3-benzene dicarboxylic acids and characterized by HR ESI-MS and multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. Every divinylphenylene diruthenium subunit is oxidized in two consecutive one-electron steps with half-wave potential splittings in the range of 250 to 330 mV. Additional, smaller redox-splittings between the +/2+ and 0/+ and the 3+/4+ and 2+/3+ redox processes, corresponding to the first and the second oxidations of every divinylphenylene diruthenium entity, are due to electrostatic effects. The lack of electronic coupling through bond or through space is explained by the nodal properties of the relevant molecular orbitals and the lateral side-by-side arrangement of the divinylphenylene linkers. The polyelectrochromic behavior of the divinylphenylene diruthenium precursors is retained and even amplified in these metallamacrocyclic structures. EPR studies down to T=4 K indicate that the dications 1-H2+ and 1-OBu2+ are paramagnetic. The dications and the tetracation of macrocycle 3-H display intense (dications) or weak (3-H4+) EPR signals. Quantum chemical calculations indicate that the four most stable conformers of the macrocycles are largely devoid of strain. Bond parameters, energies as well as charge and spin density distributions of model macrocycle 5-H-Me were calculated for the different charge and spin states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据