4.6 Article

PhyloMCL: Accurate clustering of hierarchical orthogroups guided by phylogenetic relationship and inference of polyploidy events

期刊

METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 943-954

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13401

关键词

gene duplication; hierarchical orthogroup classification; Markov clustering; paralogs; phylogenomics

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31770244]
  2. Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of Jiangxi Province [20192ACB21005]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering at Fudan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identification of homology relationships is essential for inferring gene functions, detecting phylogeny of gene families, discovering evolutionary history of life, and usually, is the first step of many genetic and genomic studies. However, the presence of gene duplicates, variation on evolutionary rates of homologs, fusion and fission of genes, can lead to misidentification of evolutionary relationships among homologs. Here we provide a Markov clustering based method called PhyloMCL to accurately detect hierarchical orthogroups (HOGs) including orthologs and paralogs, which derived from duplications subsequent to speciation of involved species, by considering both phylogenetic relationship of organisms and effects of polyploidy events. Its performance, evaluated by a list of benchmark gene families, when applying to the clustering of HOGs from 12 Metazoan genomes, reaches up to 87.8% and 83.2% on recall and precision rates respectively. Further application of PhyloMCL on classification of tens of thousands of paralogs, yielded by multiple polyploidy events during evolution of seed plants, successfully identifies the majority of in-/out-paralogs at different taxonomic levels. Benefiting from the strategy of Markov clustering and guidance of species tree, PhyloMCL can accurately classify millions of homologous genes with affordable time, meeting the challenge of phylogenomic studies upon rapid increasing of sequenced genomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据