4.6 Review

Biobased Materials from Microbial Biomass and Its Derivatives

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma13061263

关键词

biobased materials; biopolymer resources; microbial biomass; yeast biomass; fungal biomass; water kefir grains; milk kefir grains; bacterial cellulose; kombucha

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (Argentina) [PICT-2015-3150]
  2. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes (UNQ, Argentina) [PUNQ 990/19]
  3. National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) [RESOL-2018-2703-APN-DIR, Res. 4845/2014]
  4. Scientific Research Commission (CIC) [Resol-2018-621-GDEBA-CICMCTI, RI-2157-888-18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a strong public concern about plastic waste, which promotes the development of new biobased materials. The benefit of using microbial biomass for new developments is that it is a completely renewable source of polymers, which is not limited to climate conditions or may cause deforestation, as biopolymers come from vegetal biomass. The present review is focused on the use of microbial biomass and its derivatives as sources of biopolymers to form new materials. Yeast and fungal biomass are low-cost and abundant sources of biopolymers with high promising properties for the development of biodegradable materials, while milk and water kefir grains, composed by kefiran and dextran, respectively, produce films with very good optical and mechanical properties. The reasons for considering microbial cellulose as an attractive biobased material are the conformational structure and enhanced properties compared to plant cellulose. Kombucha tea, a probiotic fermented sparkling beverage, produces a floating membrane that has been identified as bacterial cellulose as a side stream during this fermentation. The results shown in this review demonstrated the good performance of microbial biomass to form new materials, with enhanced functional properties for different applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据