4.4 Article

Understanding latent demand for hybrid and plug-in electric vehicles using large-scale longitudinal survey data of US new vehicle buyers

期刊

ENERGY EFFICIENCY
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 1063-1074

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12053-020-09865-5

关键词

Plug-in electric vehicle; Fuel economy targets; Consumer adoption; Large-scale new vehicle buyer survey data

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consumer adoption of fuel-efficient vehicles is a crucial step in improving energy efficiency of the light-duty vehicle sector. To promote adoption, policymakers have employed various demand- and supply-side policies including incentives, fuel economy standards, zero emission vehicle mandate, among others. This paper measures the changes in consumers' purchase motivations and latent demand for hybrid and plug-in electric vehicles in the wake of such programs by analyzing the past 11 years of new vehicle buyer survey data in the USA with more than 1 million respondents. The analysis reveals that electric vehicles-including hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and pure battery electric, collectively termed xEVs-had the potential to secure as much as similar to 11% of the US market in 2015, but the actual market share was only one-third of this. A narrowing of the consumer's valuation gap between buyers of non-xEVs and xEVs for purchase motivations-including fuel economy, environmental friendliness, technical innovation, and price-is responsible for the increase in the latent demand for xEVs. The term valuation gap refers to the difference between the average rating given by non-xEV and xEV buyers for a particular purchase motivation question in the survey. The closer the ratings, the smaller will be the valuation gap. Policy instruments such as sales-weighted fuel economy target show strong correlation with the consumer valuation gap. In combination with demand-side policies that make xEVs more accessible to mainstream consumers, they could be considered as viable tools if policymakers are seeking to nudge consumers toward xEVs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据