4.8 Article

Interface Engineering of MXene Composite Separator for High-Performance Li-Se and Na-Se Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 10, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202000446

关键词

in-situ permeation experiments; Lewis acid-base interaction; Li; Na-Se batteries; MXene (Ti3C2Tx); separator-electrolyte interfaces

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [FT180100705, DP160104340, DP170100436, DP180102297]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selenium (Se), due to its high electronic conductivity and high energy density, has recently attracted considerable interest as a cathode material for rechargeable Li/Na batteries. However, the poor cycling stability originating from the severe shuttle effect of polyselenides hinders their practical applications. Herein, highly stable Li/Na-Se batteries are developed using ultrathin (approximate to 270 nm, loading of 0.09 mg cm(-2)) cetrimonium bromide (CTAB)/carbon nanotube (CNT)/Ti3C2Tx MXene hybrid modified polypropylene (PP) (CCNT/MXene/PP) separators. The hybrid separator can immobilize the polyselenides via enhanced Lewis acid-base interactions between CTAB/MXene and polyselenides, which is demonstrated by theoretical calculations and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The incorporation of CNT helps to improve the electrolyte infiltration and facilitate the ionic transport. In situ permeation experiments are conducted for the first time to visually study the behavior of polyselenides, revealing the prohibited shuttle effect and protected Li anode from corrosion with CCNT/MXene/PP separators. As a result, the Li-Se batteries with CCNT/MXene/PP separators deliver an outstanding cycling performance over 500 cycles at 1C with an extremely low capacity decay of 0.05% per cycle. Moreover, the hybrid separators also perform well in Na-Se batteries. This study develops a preferable separator-electrolyte interface and the concept can be applied in other conversion-type battery systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据