4.6 Article

Trianguleniums as Optical Probes for G-Quadruplexes: APhotophysical, Electrochemical, and Computational Study

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 12, 页码 4129-4139

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201504099

关键词

DNA; optical probes; nucleic acids; quadruplexes; triangulenium

资金

  1. UK's Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/I003983/1, EP/H005285/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I003983/1, EP/K039946/1, EP/H005285/1, 1231179] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/H005285/1, EP/K039946/1, EP/I003983/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nucleic acids can adopt non-duplex topologies, such as G-quadruplexes in vitro. Yet it has been challenging to establish their existence and function in vivo due to a lack of suitable tools. Recently, we identified the triangulenium compound DAOTA-M2 as a unique fluorescence probe for such studies. This probe's emission lifetime is highly dependent on the topology of the DNA it interacts with opening up the possibility of carrying out live-cell imaging studies. Herein, we describe the origin of its fluorescence selectivity for G-quadruplexes. Cyclic voltammetry predicts that the appended morpholino groups can act as intra- molecular photo-induced electron transfer (PET) quenchers. Photophysical studies show that a delicate balance between this effect and inter-molecular PET with nucleobases is key to the overall fluorescence enhancement observed upon nucleic acid binding. We utilised computational modelling to demonstrate a conformational dependence of intra-molecular PET. Finally, we performed orthogonal studies with a triangulenium compound, in which the morpholino groups were removed, and demonstrated that this change inverts triangulenium fluorescence selectivity from G-quadruplex to duplex DNA, thus highlighting the importance of fine tuning the molecular structure not only for target affinity, but also for fluorescence response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据