4.8 Article

Highly efficient electrosynthesis of hydrogen peroxide on a superhydrophobic three-phase interface by natural air diffusion

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15597-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773129, 21811530274, 21976096]
  2. Tianjin Science and Technology Program [19PTZWHZ00050]
  3. Tianjin Development Program for Innovation and Entrepreneurship
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0400706]
  5. National Special S&T Project on Water Pollution Control and Management [2017ZX07107002]
  6. 111 program, Ministry of Education, China [T2017002]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

H2O2 electrosynthesis has garnered great attention as a green alternative to the anthraquinone process. Here the authors propose a cost-effective cathode to greatly improve the O-2 diffusion coefficient, resulting in a high H2O2 production without the need for aeration. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) synthesis by electrochemical oxygen reduction reaction has attracted great attention as a green substitute for anthraquinone process. However, low oxygen utilization efficiency (<1%) and high energy consumption remain obstacles. Herein we propose a superhydrophobic natural air diffusion electrode (NADE) to greatly improve the oxygen diffusion coefficient at the cathode about 5.7 times as compared to the normal gas diffusion electrode (GDE) system. NADE allows the oxygen to be naturally diffused to the reaction interface, eliminating the need to pump oxygen/air to overcome the resistance of the gas diffusion layer, resulting in fast H2O2 production (101.67 mg h(-1) cm(-2)) with a high oxygen utilization efficiency (44.5%-64.9%). Long-term operation stability of NADE and its high current efficiency under high current density indicate great potential to replace normal GDE for H2O2 electrosynthesis and environmental remediation on an industrial scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据