4.6 Article

Tuning One-Dimensional Nanostructures of Bola-Like Peptide Amphiphiles by Varying the Hydrophilic Amino Acids

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 32, 页码 11394-11404

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201601309

关键词

amino acids; nanostructures; protein folding; self-assembly; short peptides

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21503275, 21373270]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [15CX02026A]
  3. National Science Foundation for Post-doctoral Scientists of China [2012M511555]
  4. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  5. Innovative UK
  6. ISIS Neutron Source
  7. STFC
  8. DANSE project under NSF [DMR-0520547]
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1540614] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By combining experimental measurements and computer simulations, we here show that for the bola-like peptide amphiphiles XI4X, where X=K, R, and H, the hydrophilic amino acid substitutions have little effect on the beta-sheet hydrogen-bonding between peptide backbones. Whereas all of the peptides self-assemble into one dimensional (1D) nanostructures with completely different morphologies, that is, nanotubes and helical nanoribbons for KI4K, flat and multilayered nanoribbons for HI4H, and twisted and bilayered nanoribbons for RI4R. These different 1D morphologies can be explained by the distinct stacking degrees and modes of the three peptide beta-sheets along the x-direction (width) and the z-direction ( height), which microscopically originate from the hydrogen-bonding ability of the sheets to solvent molecules and the pairing of hydrophilic amino acid side chains between beta-sheet monolayers through stacking interactions and hydrogen bonding. These different 1D nanostructures have distinct surface chemistry and functions, with great potential in various applications exploiting the respective properties of these hydrophilic amino acids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据