4.8 Article

Dynamic co-catalysis of Au single atoms and nanoporous Au for methane pyrolysis

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15806-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2017YFA0700104]
  3. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51825102]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51671145, 21506148, 51761165012, 51971157]
  5. Tianjin Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [19JCJQJC61800]
  6. National Program for Thousand Young Talents of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanocatalysts and single-atom catalysts are both vital for heterogeneous catalysis. They are recognized as two different categories of catalysts. Nevertheless, recent theoretical works have indicated that Au nanoparticles/clusters release Au single atoms in CO oxidation, and they co-catalyze the oxidation. However, to date, neither experimental evidence for the co-catalysis nor direct observations on any heterogeneous catalysis process of single-atom catalysts are reported. Here, the dynamic process of nanoporous Au to catalyze methane pyrolysis is monitored by in situ transmission electron microscopy with high spatial-temporal resolutions. It demonstrates that nanoporous Au surfaces partially disintegrate, releasing Au single atoms. As demonstrated by DFT calculation, the single atoms could co-catalyze the reaction with nanoporous Au. Moreover, the single atoms dynamically aggregate into nanoparticles, which re-disintegrate back to single atoms. This work manifests that under certain conditions, the heterogeneous catalysis processes of nanocatalysts and single-atom catalysts are not independent, where their dynamic co-catalysis exists. Nanocatalysts and single-atom catalysts are generally considered as two categories with distinct performances. Here, in situ TEM study of catalytic methane pyrolysis over nanoporous Au reveals a highly dynamic process where co-catalysis exists among various catalyst forms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据