4.8 Article

Autophosphorylation at serine 166 regulates RIP kinase 1-mediated cell death and inflammation

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15466-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [PA 1476/8-1, 411102043, SFB1403, 414786233, SFB829, 73111208, 390661388]
  2. European Research Council [787826]
  3. Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen (FWO) [G013715N, G044518N, EOS MODEL-IDI 30826052]
  4. Flemish Government (Methusalem) [BOF09/01M00709, BOF16/MET_V/007]
  5. Ghent University
  6. Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB)
  7. FWO
  8. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Overseas Research Fellowship [201860571]
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [787826] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Receptor interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) regulates cell death and inflammatory responses downstream of TNFR1 and other receptors, and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and degenerative diseases. RIPK1 kinase activity induces apoptosis and necroptosis, however the mechanisms and phosphorylation events regulating RIPK1-dependent cell death signaling remain poorly understood. Here we show that RIPK1 autophosphorylation at serine 166 plays a critical role for the activation of RIPK1 kinase-dependent apoptosis and necroptosis. Moreover, we show that S166 phosphorylation is required for RIPK1 kinase-dependent pathogenesis of inflammatory pathologies in vivo in four relevant mouse models. Mechanistically, we provide evidence that trans autophosphorylation at S166 modulates RIPK1 kinase activation but is not by itself sufficient to induce cell death. These results show that S166 autophosphorylation licenses RIPK1 kinase activity to induce downstream cell death signaling and inflammation, suggesting that S166 phosphorylation can serve as a reliable biomarker for RIPK1 kinase-dependent pathologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据