4.8 Article

Mapping the breast cancer metastatic cascade onto ctDNA using genetic and epigenetic clonal tracking

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15047-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Breast Cancer Now
  2. Wellcome Trust [202778/B/16/Z, 105104/Z/14/Z]
  3. Cancer Research UK [A23110, A22909, A23536]
  4. National Institute of Health [NCI U54 CA217376]
  5. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skodowska-Curie Research Fellowship scheme [846614]
  6. NIH [U54 CA217376, P01 CA91955, R01 CA170595, R01 CA185138, R01 CA140657]
  7. CDMRP Breast Cancer Research Program Award [BC132057]
  8. Arizona Investigator Grant [ADHS18-198847]
  9. Pilot LEGACY programme by Breast Cancer Now (Breakthrough Breast Cancer) UK
  10. Royal Marsden and ICR NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  11. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [846614] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) allows tracking of the evolution of human cancers at high resolution, overcoming many limitations of tissue biopsies. However, exploiting ctDNA to determine how a patient's cancer is evolving in order to aid clinical decisions remains difficult. This is because ctDNA is a mix of fragmented alleles, and the contribution of different cancer deposits to ctDNA is largely unknown. Profiling ctDNA almost invariably requires prior knowledge of what genomic alterations to track. Here, we leverage on a rapid autopsy programme to demonstrate that unbiased genomic characterisation of several metastatic sites and concomitant ctDNA profiling at whole-genome resolution reveals the extent to which ctDNA is representative of widespread disease. We also present a methylation profiling method that allows tracking evolutionary changes in ctDNA at single-molecule resolution without prior knowledge. These results have critical implications for the use of liquid biopsies to monitor cancer evolution in humans and guide treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据