4.1 Article

Environmental-friendly gold nanoparticle immunochromatographic assay for ochratoxin A based on biosynthetic mimetic mycotoxin-conjugates

期刊

WORLD MYCOTOXIN JOURNAL
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 267-275

出版社

WAGENINGEN ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3920/WMJ2019.2511

关键词

ochratoxin A; immunochromatographic assay; mycotoxin; immunoassay

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1602203]
  2. National Natural Science Funds [NSFC-31671924]
  3. Jiangxi Province Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholar [20171BCB23023]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi, China [20181BAB204019]
  5. Open Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University [SKLF-KF-201825]
  6. Science and Technology Innovation Platform Project of Jiangxi Province [20192BCD40001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a possibly carcinogenic mycotoxin which is one of the most abundant food contaminants. It can be normally monitored and detected by immunochromatographic assays (ICG) which have a good sensitivity and specificity and easy to operate. However, the development of normal ICG is based on traditional OTA-conjugates or chemosynthetic mimotope peptides, which are very high-cost reagents with a detrimental effect on the environment and operators. This study takes advantage of both biosynthetic mimetic OTA-conjugates and a convenient IGG to develop a novel environmental-friendly and low-cost ICG for the rapid detection of OTA. Qualitatively, the visual cut-off level of the developed ICG for OTA was 0.8 ng/ml, which is 10-fold more sensitive than the chemosynthetic mimotope peptide based ICG, while there is no cross-reaction with other mycotoxins. The assay takes only 15 min to acquire results visible to the naked eye. Quantitatively, the half inhibition concentration of the ICG setup with mimetic OTA-conjugates was 0.187 ng/ml, with a linear range of 0.015 to 0.5 ng/ml. These results demonstrate the potential to adapt the method for detecting other toxic mycotoxins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据