4.1 Review

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia in adults: primary risk factors and diagnostic procedures

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 585-597

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1754791

关键词

Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia; cold agglutinin disease; autoantibodies; bone marrow responsiveness index; checkpoint inhibitors; complement; direct antiglobulin test; risk factors; rituximab; secondary autoimmune hemolytic anemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is due to autoantibodies against erythrocytes that may arise either because of primary tolerance breakage or along with several associated conditions, including genetic predispositions, congenital syndromes, environmental triggers, autoimmune diseases, immunodeficiencies, and neoplasms. Areas covered: This review evaluated the risk of AIHA development in associated conditions and summarized disease-intrinsic risk factors for relapse and outcome. Diagnostic procedures were analyzed to properly identify primary and secondary forms. A Medline including clinical trials, meta-analyses, guidelines, consensus, and case reports, published in the last 30 years were performed. Expert opinion: The several associated conditions listed above constitute a risk for AIHA development and should be considered since disease course and therapy may be different. Particularly, AIHA developing after transplant or novel checkpoint inhibitors is an emerging complex entity whose proper therapy is still an unmet need. Concerning intrinsic risk factors, the severity of anemia at onset correlated with the recurrence of relapses, refractoriness, and fatal outcome. This finding reflects the presence of several mechanisms involved in AIHA, i.e. highly pathogenic antibodies, complement activation, and failure of marrow compensation. With the advent of novel target therapies (complement and various tyrosine kinase inhibitors), a risk-adapted therapy for AIHA is becoming fundamental.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据