4.6 Article

Electrochemical Synthesis and Catalytic Properties of Encapsulated Metal Clusters within Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 46, 页码 16613-16620

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201602924

关键词

CO oxidation; electrochemical synthesis; encapsulation; metal-organic frameworks; noble metal clusters

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB821700, 2014CB931800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21401069, 21501024]
  3. Major International (Regional) Joint Research Project of NSFC [21120102034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is very interesting and also a big challenge to encapsulate metal clusters within microporous solids to expand their application diversity. For this target, herein, we present an electrochemical synthesis strategy for the encapsulation of noble metals (Au, Pd, Pt) within ZIF-8 cavities. In this method, metal precursors of AuCl42-, PtCl62-, and PdCl42- are introduced into ZIF-8 crystals during the concurrent crystallization of ZIF-8 at the anode. As a consequence, very small metal clusters with sizes around 1.2nm are obtained within ZIF-8 crystals after hydrogen reduction; these clusters exhibit high thermal stability, as evident from the good maintenance of their original sizes after a high-temperature test. The catalytic properties of the encapsulated metal clusters within ZIF-8 are evaluated for CO oxidations. Because of the small pore window of ZIF-8 (0.34nm) and the confinement effect of small pores, about 80% of the metal clusters (fractions of 0.74, 0.77, and 0.75 for Au, Pt, and Pd in ZIF-8, respectively) retain their catalytic activity after exposure to the organosulfur poison thiophene (0.46nm), which is in contrast to their counterparts (fractions of 0.22, 0.25, and 0.20 for Au, Pt, and Pd on the SiO2 support). The excellent performances of metal clusters encapsulated within ZIF-8 crystals give new opportunities for catalytic reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据