4.6 Article

Rous Sarcoma Virus Genomic RNA Dimerization Capability In Vitro Is Not a Prerequisite for Viral Infectivity

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v12050568

关键词

Rous sarcoma virus (RSV); retroviruses; Gag polyprotein; packaging signal (Psi); selective 2 '-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE); RNA secondary structure; RNA structure-probing; dimerization initiation signal (DIS); RNA-protein interactions; UV crosslinking-coupled SHAPE (XL-SHAPE)

类别

资金

  1. NIH [RO1 AI153216, R01 CA76534, F30 CA214010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retroviruses package their full-length, dimeric genomic RNA (gRNA) via specific interactions between the Gag polyprotein and a Psi packaging signal located in the gRNA 5 ' -UTR. Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) gRNA has a contiguous, well-defined Psi element, that directs the packaging of heterologous RNAs efficiently. The simplicity of RSV Psi makes it an informative model to examine the mechanism of retroviral gRNA packaging, which is incompletely understood. Little is known about the structure of dimerization initiation sites or specific Gag interaction sites of RSV gRNA. Using selective 2 ' -hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE), we probed the secondary structure of the entire RSV 5 ' -leader RNA for the first time. We identified a putative bipartite dimerization initiation signal (DIS), and mutation of both sites was required to significantly reduce dimerization in vitro. These mutations failed to reduce viral replication, suggesting that in vitro dimerization results do not strictly correlate with in vivo infectivity, possibly due to additional RNA interactions that maintain the dimers in cells. UV crosslinking-coupled SHAPE (XL-SHAPE) was next used to determine Gag-induced RNA conformational changes, revealing G218 as a critical Gag contact site. Overall, our results suggest that disruption of either of the DIS sequences does not reduce virus replication and reveal specific sites of Gag-RNA interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据