4.3 Article

Application of an Improved Micro-amount of Virion Enrichment Technique (MiVET) for the Detection of Avian Influenza A Virus in Spiked Chicken Meat Samples

期刊

FOOD AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIROLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12560-020-09425-1

关键词

MiVET; Micro-amount of virion enrichment technique; Influenza A virus; Chicken; Meat

资金

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency [VP30218088304]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP18K05535]
  3. JSPS Bilateral Open Partnership Joint Research Projects
  4. AMED [JP19jk0210007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Highly sensitive detection of pathogens is effective for screening meat during quarantine inspection and export. The micro-amount of virion enrichment technique (MiVET) was recently developed, which is a new method combining virus concentration with immunomagnetic beads and simple RNA extraction with sodium dodecyl benzenesulfonate (SDBS) for the specific and sensitive detection of avian influenza viruses (AIVs). AIV subtypes H3N2 and H4N2 were used to spike the surface of chicken breast meat samples. The modified MiVET protocol was tested by comparing it against three different homogenate preparation conditions, as well as in samples with added alpha-amylase and collagenase to digest inhibitors. The performance of the modified MiVET was evaluated by real-time RT-PCR assay targeting the matrix gene. Compared with conventional RNA extraction, the modified MiVET reproducibly concentrated AIVs in chicken meat samples with 100-1000-fold improvement by 60 s-hand homogenization. The 30 s- and 60 s-stomacher homogenizations resulted 100-fold and 10-100-fold improvement, respectively. The modified MiVET required < 60 min from homogenate preparation to final RNA elution. Further, use of the modified MiVET also decreased the rate of false-negative results. The modified MiVET is effective for the rapid and highly sensitive detection of AIVs in chicken meat samples, and can be applied to quarantine and export inspection at airports and seaports.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据