4.5 Article

BRAFV600E Mutation is Associated with an Increased Risk of Papillary Thyroid Cancer Recurrence

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 44, 期 8, 页码 2685-2691

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05521-2

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. American Thyroid Association Research Award
  2. Massachusetts General Hospital Claflin Distinguished Scholar Award
  3. [NIH/NCI-K07CA177900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Papillary thyroid carcinoma is the most common endocrine malignancy and one of the most common cancers worldwide. However, the optimal timing and frequency of surveillance to assess for recurrence remain undetermined. As the incidence of thyroid cancer continues to rise worldwide, identifying risk factors for recurrence and investigating intervals and durations of surveillance are paramount to adapt treatment and follow-up plans to high-risk individuals and to reduce interventions for low-risk patients. Methods Our dataset included an unselected cohort of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients who underwent a total thyroidectomy (or unilateral then completion thyroidectomy) at a single institution from 2000 to 2007. BRAF genotyping was performed on available specimens by a validated PCR-based assay. Pathologic structural recurrence was the primary outcome. We performed univariate and multivariable analyses to identify predictors of cancer recurrence. Results In total, 599 patients underwent complete resection of the thyroid gland for PTC. The cohort was young (mean age 45.0 years), predominately female (n = 462, 76.9%), and median follow-up was 10.3 years (IQR 5.4-12.2). Recurrence occurred more commonly in the BRAF(V600E) group (18.6 vs. 9.9%, p = 0.02). BRAF independently predicted PTC recurrence (HR 2.81, p = 0.006). Conclusions BRAF mutation is an independent predictor of papillary thyroid carcinoma long-term recurrence. Understanding molecular characteristics of individual thyroid cancers may help risk-stratify patients and direct them toward more appropriate initial care and long-term surveillance strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据