4.8 Article

Application of chemometric methods and QSAR models to support pesticide risk assessment starting from ecotoxicological datasets

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115583

关键词

Pesticide; QSAR; Ecotoxicology; Endpoint

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The EFSA 'Guidance on tiered risk assessment for edge-of-field surface waters' underscores the importance of in silico models to support the pesticide risk assessment. The aim of this work was to use in silico models starting from an available, structured and harmonized pesticide dataset that was developed for different purposes, in order to stimulate the use of QSAR models for risk assessment. The present work focuses on the development of a set of in silico models, developed to predict the aquatic toxicity of heterogeneous pesticides with incomplete/unknown toxic behavior in the water compartment. The generated models have good fitting performances (R-2 : 0.75-0.99), they are internally robust (Q(2) loo: 0.66-0.98) and can handle up to 30% of perturbation of the training set (Q(2) Imo: 0.64-0.98). The absence of chance correlation was guaranteed by low values of R-2 calculated on scrambled responses (R-2 Y-scr: 0.11-0.38). Different statistical parameters were used to quantify the external predictivity of the models (CCCext: 0.73-0.91, Q(2) ext-Fn: 0.53-0.96). The results indicate that all the best models are predictive when applied to chemicals not involved in the models development. In addition, all models have similar accuracy both in fitting and in prediction and this represents a good degree of generalization. These models may be useful to support the risk assessment procedure when experimental data for key species are missing or to create prioritization lists for the general a priori assessment of the potential toxicity of existing and new pesticides which fall in the applicability domain. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据