4.8 Article

Improved methodology to determine the fate and transport of microplastics in a secondary wastewater treatment plant

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115549

关键词

Microplastics; Wastewater; Sludge; Secondary treatment; Methodology; Glitter

资金

  1. Hunter Water Corporation
  2. University of Newcastle, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wastewater treatment plants are a significant pathway of microplastics (MPs) to aquatic environments. To develop suitable management options and reduce microplastic emissions in treated effluent and sludge, we must first develop a reliable method to understand their transport and fate throughout the treatment process. An improved methodology was applied to determine the size, shape, polymer type and partitioning behaviour of MPs using a combination of oxidation treatment, fluorescent staining and Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) to detect small MPs <= 20 mm in wastewater. The mean number of MPs (<5 mm) detected using this methodology was 11.80 +/- 1.10 MP/L in raw sewage, 5.23 +/- 0.25 MP/L in degritted wastewater, 7.91 +/- 0.44 MP/L in waste activated sludge and 2.76 +/- 0.11 MP/L in the final treated effluent. An increase in MPs following primary screening suggests thatWAS is a sink for several stealth microplastics, including glitter, which is returned to the effluent during the treatment process. The estimated MP removal efficiency for the studied WWTP is relatively poor compared with global data for secondary WWTPs, which is likely due to the release of partially treated effluent into the Pacific Ocean via a second discharge point. The information generated through this study can be useful to; firstly, inform on-site wastewater management practices, and secondly, reduce MP concentrations in final treated effluents discharged to the marine environment. (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据