4.6 Article

Removal of Sulfamethoxazole in Aqueous Solutions by Iron-Based Advanced Oxidation Processes: Performances and Mechanisms

期刊

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
卷 231, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-020-04534-w

关键词

Nanoscale zero-valent iron; Persulfate; Reduction; Oxidation; Sulfamethoxazole; Antibiotic

资金

  1. Science and Technology Plan Project of Hunan Province [2018SK2047]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfamethoxazole (SMX), a representative sulfonamide antibiotic, has been identified as a new kind of persistent pollutant with property of hard biodegradation and hydrolyzation. Conventional methods cannot remove it well. In this study, the performances and mechanisms for SMX degradation were examined by persulfate (PS) activation with nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) at various conditions including dosages of nZVI and PS, pH value, and initial SMX concentration. Results showed that about 88.4% SMX (10 mg/L) was removed by nZVI/PS system (0.10 g/L nZVI, 1.0 mM PS) within 120 min compared to 63.1% by nZVI alone system under room temperature. Lower initial SMX concentration and higher PS concentration were beneficial to the degradation of SMX, while pH (from 3.11 to 9.33) and nZVI dosage (from 0.05 to 0.30 g/L) had little effect. Radical quenching experiment and electron spin resonance test demonstrated that the degradation of SMX was attributed to sulfate radicals (SO4 center dot-) and hydroxyl radicals (center dot OH) produced in this system. SMX reduction reaction by nZVI in nZVI/PS process was proved by reductive-oxidative degradation experiment and HPLC test, and the reduction product could be oxidized by SO4 center dot- and center dot OH to other products even to H2O and CO2. Further, probable removal mechanisms have also been proposed. This study manifests that nZVI/PS system is effective for SMX removal and may provide some ideas for understanding the transformation process of antibiotic in iron-based advanced oxidation processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据