4.6 Article

Managing the Invasive Cyanobacterium Lyngbya wollei in a Southeastern USA Reservoir: Evaluation of a Multi-year Treatment Program

期刊

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
卷 231, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-020-04532-y

关键词

Algaecide; Noxious cyanobacteria; Management; Field application

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lyngbya wollei is a filamentous cyanobacterium that causes numerous adverse impacts in reservoirs and lakes, such as toxin production, harboring fecal bacteria, devaluing property, impeding navigation/recreation, and degrading wildlife habitat. This study assessed a chemical treatment program in a Southeastern USA reservoir using a chelated copper formulation (Captain (R) XTR) in combination with diquat dibromide (Tribune (R)) over 2 years. The treatment program consisted of multiple applications during the summer and fall months. Overall, biomass decreased significantly (alpha = 0.05) in the two treated coves, by 97 and 80%, whereas L. wollei increased significantly (alpha = 0.05) in the untreated reference cove, by 25,127%. During the study, the quantity of algaecide applied was decreased in one of the treatment coves to adjust for the reduction in L. wollei biomass, as well as reduction in treated area, as part of an adaptive management strategy. The measured exposure demonstrated the residence time of the copper algaecide was short, with most of the copper dissipating in hours, which was attributed to sorption to L. wollei, sediments, and dilution. The biomass monitoring procedure, used transects spaced in 150 m intervals and sampled algae at 0-2 m, 5-7 m, and 10-14 m distances from shore, was effective at discerning changes in L. wollei biomass in the treated and untreated coves. This study indicated that the treatment program was effective for reducing L. wollei biomass and demonstrated the utility of the surveying technique to implement adaptive management of this filamentous cyanobacterium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据