4.6 Article

A Red to Near-IR Fluorogen: Aggregation-Induced Emission, Large Stokes Shift, High Solid Efficiency and Application in Cell-Imaging

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 28, 页码 9784-9791

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201600125

关键词

aggregation-induced emission; cell-imaging; red-NIR fluorescence; solvatochromism; Stokes shift

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013CB834704]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [51573158, 51273175]
  3. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [16301614, N_HKUST604/14, N_HKUST620/11]
  4. Zhejiang Innovative Research Team Program [2013TD02]
  5. Guangdong Innovative Research Team Program [201101C0105067115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A tetraphenylethene (TPE) derivative modified with the strong electron acceptor 2-dicyano-methylene-3-cyano-4,5,5-trimethyl-2,5-dihydrofuran (TCF) was obtained in high yield by a simple two-step reaction. The resultant TPE-TCF showed evident aggregation-induced emission (AIE) features and pronounced solvatochromic behavior. Changing the solvent from apolar cyclohexane to highly polar acetonitrile, the emission peak shifted from 560 to 680 nm (120 nm redshift). In an acetonitrile solution and in the solid powder, the Stokes shifts are as large as 230 and 190 nm, respectively. The solid film emits red to near-IR (red-NIR) fluorescence with an emission peak at 670 nm and a quantum efficiency of 24.8 %. Taking the advantages of red-NIR emission and high efficiency, nanoparticles (NPs) of TPE-TCF were fabricated by using tat-modified 1,2-distearoylsn-glycero-3-phosphor- ethanol-amine-N-[methoxy-(polyethyl-eneglycol)-2000] as the encapsulation matrix. The obtained NPs showed perfect membrane penetrability and high fluorescent imaging quality of cell cytoplasm. Upon co-incubation with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) in the presence of tritons, the capsulated TPE-TCF nanoparticles could enter into the nucleus and displayed similar staining properties to those of DAPI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据