4.7 Article

Enhancing anaerobic oxidation of methane in municipal solid waste landfill cover soil

期刊

WASTE MANAGEMENT
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 44-54

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.03.009

关键词

Anaerobic oxidation of methane; Electron acceptors; Batch reactors; Column reactors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Landfills are the third largest anthropogenic source of the greenhouse gas methane worldwide. In the upper portions of landfill covers, methane is oxidized aerobically by microorganisms to form the less-potent greenhouse gas carbon dioxide; however, because of the low permeability of oxygen, no aerobic oxidation occurs in deeper portions of the cover. Therefore, the goal of this study was to enhance anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) in the deeper parts of landfill covers, to increase overall methane removal, via addition of electron acceptors besides oxygen. In batch tests, landfill cover soil was amended using five alternate electron acceptors: iron(III), nitrate, nitrite, sulfate, and manganese. AOM was then measured via column tests, which included realistic conditions of gas flow, cover thickness, and compaction. In the batch tests, soils amended with nitrate, sulfate, and the combination of sulfate + hematite removed more methane compared to control soil. Methane generation inhibitor had no impact on net methane removal. Adding nutrients to the soil significantly enhanced methane removal only for the case of soil without electron acceptors. Greater methane removal was observed for reactors with higher initial methane concentration. Results of the column tests showed that soil amended with sulfate + iron had the highest (around 10%) removal of methane in the anoxic zone, followed by soil amended with sulfate. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas was measured in the headspace of these two columns, which indicated that sulfate-reducing bacteria were likely responsible for methane removal. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据