4.5 Article

An energy and emission conscious adaptive cruise controller for a connected automated diesel truck

期刊

VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS
卷 58, 期 5, 页码 805-825

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2020.1740283

关键词

Connected automated vehicles; model predictive control; diesel powertrain; fuel efficiency; NOx emissions control; robustness to drive cycle

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1646019]
  2. Division of Computer and Network Systems
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1646019] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1646019] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conventional speed planning for connected automated vehicles (CAVs) adopts an energy-centric perspective and improves fuel economy by means of reducing the power loss due to braking and operating the engine at its high efficiency region. This paper considers a simulated connected automated truck with a diesel powertrain and a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system for the treatment of NOx emissions, and first shows that a 20% fuel economy improvement is followed by up to 50% increase in NOx emissions with conventional speed planning due to its sole focus on energy that neglects emissions. Then, a novel model predictive controller (MPC) is designed for concurrent treatment of energy and emissions within speed planning of the CAV. Details of this energy and emissions conscious (EC) MPC design are described, including the vehicle, powertrain and emission model development, selection of the appropriate objective function and its parameters for acceptable optimality, and computational performance. Simulation results of the EC-MPC over multiple drive cycles are presented to demonstrate the robust performance of the controller. The results show 5-15% improvement in the fuel economy with a corresponding 0-25% reduction in NOx emissions for different drive cycles without requiring re-calibration for each test cycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据