4.7 Article

Numerical investigation of cavitation generated by an ultrasonic dental scaler tip vibrating in a compressible liquid

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.104963

关键词

Vibro-acoustics; Finite element method; Cavitation; Dental implant; Ultrasonic scaler tip

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/P015743/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/P015743/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial biofilm accumulation around dental implants is a significant problem leading to peri-implant diseases and implant failure. Cavitation occurring in the cooling water around ultrasonic scaler tips can be used as a novel solution to remove debris without any surface damage. However, current clinically available instruments provide insufficient cavitation around the activated tip surface. To solve this problem a critical understanding of the vibro-acoustic behaviour of the scaler tip and the associated cavitation dynamics is necessary. In this research, we carried out a numerical study for an ultrasound dental scaler with a curved shape tip vibrating in water, using ABAQUS based on the finite element method. We simulated the three-dimensional, nonlinear and transient interaction between the vibration and deformation of the scaler tip, the water flow around the scaler and the cavitation formation and dynamics. The numerical model was well validated with the experiments and there was excellent agreement for displacement at the free end of the scaler. A systematic parametric study has been carried out for the cavitation volume around the scaler tip in terms of the frequency, amplitude and power of the tip vibration. The numerical results indicate that the amount of cavitation around the scaler tip increases with the frequency and amplitude of the vibration. However, if the frequency is far from the natural frequency, the cavitation volume around the free end decreases due to reduced free end vibration amplitude.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据