4.6 Review

Next-Generation Neuroimmunology: New Technologies to Understand Central Nervous System Autoimmunity

期刊

TRENDS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 341-354

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2020.02.005

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [GR3946/3-1, CRCTR128 A09, ME4050/4-1, ME4050/8-1]
  2. ERA-Net for Research on Rare Diseases
  3. Innovative Medical Research (IMF) program of the University Munster
  4. Ministerium fur Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung (MIWF) des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen
  5. German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [01GI1603A]
  6. European Union
  7. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Studies Munster [Kl3/010/19]
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [CRCTR128 A08, CRC1009 A03, CRCTR128 B01, CRCTR128]
  9. German Ministry for Education and Research
  10. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Studies (IZKF) Munster
  11. Innovative Medical Research Munster
  12. Else Kroner Fresenius Foundation
  13. Fresenius Foundation
  14. Hertie Foundation
  15. NRW Ministry of Education and Research
  16. RE Children's Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding neuroimmunological disorders is essential for developing new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Rodent models have provided valuable insights, but are sometimes equated with their human counterparts. Here, we summarize how novel technologies may enable an improved human-focused view of immune mechanisms. Recent studies have applied these new technologies to the brain parenchyma, its surrounding cerebrospinal fluid, and peripheral immune compartments. Therapeutic interventions have also facilitated translational understanding in a reverse way. However, with improved technology, access to patient samples remains a rate-limiting step in translational research. We anticipate that next-generation neuroimmunology is likely to integrate, in the immediate future, diverse technical tools for optimal diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of neuroimmunological disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据