4.6 Article

The paradox of dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibition in enterocytic differentiation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in rat cholestatic sepsis

期刊

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
卷 394, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2020.114956

关键词

DPP-IV; PI3K/Akt (PKB) axis; E-cadherin; beta-catenin; Vimentin; EMT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proper enterocytic proliferation/differentiation, besides providing adequate adherens junctions (AJ) integrity, are responsible for strengthening of the gut barrier that acts as a first line defense against endotoxemia. However, the preferential role of the underlying PI3K/Akt (PKB) axis in triggering enterocytic proliferation/differentiation signaling and AJ assembly is still obscure in sepsis. Additionally, the potential involvement of dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-IV in cholestatic sepsis has not yet been reported. Common bile duct ligation (CBDL) insult was performed in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats except for sham operated animals; three doses of vildagliptin (VLD3, 10 and 30 mg/kg/d; p.o) were administered for 10 consecutive days post CBDL. VLD3/10/30 dose-dependently decreased DPP-IV and elevated GLP-1, IGF-1, PI3K, pS473-Akt (PKB), pS9-GSK-3 beta, pS133-CREB and cyclin-D1. VLD3/10 reduced fever, portal/aortic endotoxin and IgG, body weight loss as well as ileal NF-kappa B, TNF-alpha, MPO, TBARS, subepithelial/pericryptal and submucosal collagen deposition, vimentin immunoreactivity, N-cadherin, Zebl and pY654-beta-catenin but increased E-cadherin, NPSH and colon/spleen indices - effects that were quite the opposite of VLD30. Accordingly, maintaining proper enterocytic proliferation/differentiation and phosphorylation inputs consequent to adequate DPP-IV inhibition is integral to AJ assembly in cholestatic sepsis; however, perturbed signals by excessive suppression of the enzyme activity induce toxic effects manifested as AJ disassembly and EMT, hence gut leakage and overt endotoxemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据