4.6 Article

Critical-sized bone defects regeneration using a bone-inspired 3D bilayer collagen membrane in combination with leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin membrane (L-PRF): An in vivo study

期刊

TISSUE & CELL
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2019.101326

关键词

Bone regeneration; Leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin; Beta-Tricalcium phosphate; Rabbit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: We aim to develop a 3D-bilayer collagen (COL) membrane reinforced with nano beta-tricalcium-phosphate (n beta-TCP) particles and to evaluate its bone regeneration in combination with leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in vivo. Background data: L-PRF has exhibited promising results as a cell carrier in bone regeneration in a number of clinical studies, however there are some studies that did not confirm the positive results of L-PRF application. Methods: Mechanical & physiochemical characteristics of the COL/n beta-TCP membrane (1/2 & 1/4) were tested. Proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of seeded cells on bilayer collagen/n beta-TCP thick membrane was examined. Then, critical-sized calvarial defects in 8 white New Zealand rabbits were filled with either Col, Col/ n beta-TCP, Col/n beta-TCP combined with L-PRF membrane, or left empty. New bone formation (NBF) was measured histomorphometrically 4 & 8 weeks postoperatively. Results: Compressive modulus increases while porosity decreases with higher beta-TCP concentrations. Mechanical properties improve, with 89 % porosity (pore size -100 mu m) in the bilayer-collagen/n beta-TCP membrane. The bilayer design also enhances the proliferation and ALP activity. In vivo study shows no significant difference among test groups at 4 weeks, but Col/n beta-TCP + L-PRF demonstrates more NBF compared to others (P < 0.05) after 8 weeks. Conclusion: The bilayer-collagen/n beta-TCP thick membrane shows promising physiochemical in vitro results and significant NBF, as 3/4 of the defect is filled with lamellar bone when combined with L-PRF membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据