4.7 Article

Effect of substrate surface roughness on properties of cold-sprayed copper coatings on SS316L steel

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 389, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125619

关键词

Cold-spray; Roughness; In-situ micro-tensile; Copper; Gamma irradiation

资金

  1. Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS) [39/19/2015-BRNS]
  2. Department of Science and TechnologyFunds for Improvement in Science and Technology (DST-FIST) INDIA [SR/FST/ETI-379/2014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of thick pure copper coatings on SS316 substrates with desired properties for Tokamaks is still a challenging task. The solution to this task can help to fulfill the demanding requirements of in-vessel materials for plasma passivation. In the present work, the effect of substrate surface roughness on several properties of cold-sprayed copper coatings was investigated. Effect of post-heat-treatment on the properties of the developed coatings was also studied. The developed coatings were characterized using various techniques viz.; scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, optical microscopy, microhardness, nanoindentation, electrical and thermal conductivity measurements, and density and porosity analyses. The novelty of the article includes in-situ micro-tensile testing of the developed coatings to understand their fracture mechanism, which showed multi-crack failure. Moreover, the cracks were found to be originating from the multi-splat boundary junctions, followed by growth along the splat boundaries. Additionally, gamma-rays and heavy-nuclei irradiation along with thermal cyclic exposure studies were also performed to elucidate the actual environmental performance of the coatings. The coatings developed on the mirror-finished surface were found to have better mechanical and physical properties as compared to the coatings developed on the rough substrate surface; prior as-well-as post-heat-treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据