4.7 Article

Suitability of data preprocessing methods for landslide displacement forecasting

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-020-01824-x

关键词

Landslide displacement forecasting; Disaster mitigation; Preprocessing; Normalization method

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1507200, 2017YFC1501305]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41630643, 41827808]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) [41827808]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data preprocessing is an indispensable step for landslide displacement forecasting, which is an effective approach for predicting the deformation and failure behaviors of landslides. However, most studies focus on the construction of displacement forecast models and ignore the influence of data preprocessing on the forecasting results. Data normalization is an important part of data preprocessing; however, the selection of a data normalization method is subjective and arbitrary. In this study, four types of normalization methods for data preprocessing are presented, and these methods are applied in forecasting the displacement of bank landslides in the Three Gorges Reservoir area with various deformation mechanisms for comparison. The results demonstrate that (1) the selected normalization method substantially influences the forecast performance; (2) the normalization method is closely related to the selected forecasting model and is less dependent on the landslide deformation mechanism; and (3) the commonly used max-min normalization approach is not the optimal method, and the zero-mean normalization method is optimal for the particle swarm optimizer of support vector machine (PSO-SVM) method, while the logarithmic normalization method is optimal for the extreme learning machine method. The obtained results suggest that the data preprocessing methods must be carefully selected in landslide displacement forecasting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据