4.2 Review

Softball pitching mechanics and shoulder injuries: a narrative review

期刊

SPORTS BIOMECHANICS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 715-727

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1757142

关键词

Windmill; throwing; glenohumeral; kinematics; kinetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Softball is the third most popular women's collegiate sport in the US, but research on the biomechanics of the windmill pitch and its associated shoulder injuries is limited. The windmill pitch puts significant demands on the shoulder and increases the risk of injuries, including rotator cuff, glenoid labrum, and biceps brachii lesions. Pitcher-specific training and whole-body conditioning should be incorporated to minimize the risk of shoulder injuries.
Softball is the third most popular women's collegiate sport in the United States, with 19,680 total athletes as of the 2015-2016 season. Despite its popularity and growth in recent years, research focusing on the biomechanics of the windmill pitch and its associated shoulder injuries is relatively scarce. The incidence of shoulder injury is highest during the preseason and the beginning of the regular season. The windmill pitch can be divided into distinct phases, with the shoulder experiencing the greatest force during the delivery phase. Significant demands placed on the shoulder during the windmill pitch put pitchers at a higher risk of developing shoulder injuries than position players. Maximum shoulder compression/distraction forces during the windmill pitch have been shown to be comparable to those experienced during the baseball overhand throw, dispelling the myth that the windmill pitch is not taxing on the shoulder. Injuries associated with the high compression/distraction forces include lesions to the rotator cuff, glenoid labrum, and biceps brachii. Pitcher-specific training, cross-training, and whole-body conditioning should be incorporated into current training regimens to decrease the risk of shoulder injuries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据