4.2 Article

Acute effects of wearable thigh and shank loading on spatiotemporal and kinematic variables during maximum velocity sprinting

期刊

SPORTS BIOMECHANICS
卷 21, 期 10, 页码 1234-1248

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1748099

关键词

Hamstring; kinematics; performance; sprint; wearable resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of thigh and shank loading on sprint performance and found that both led to small reductions in sprint velocity. Thigh loading resulted in a small reduction in peak hip flexion angle during swing, while shank loading led to a small increase in peak biceps femoris muscle-tendon unit length.
Light wearable resistance is used in sprint training but the scientific evidence to guide its implementation is limited. This study investigated thigh and shank loading protocols which were matched based on the average increase in moment of inertia about the hip over a stride cycle. Seven university-level sprinters completed three counterbalanced conditions (unloaded, shank-loaded, thigh-loaded), and kinematic variables were measured between 30 and 40 m. Both thigh and shank loading led to small reductions in step velocity (mean change = -1.4% and -1.2%, respectively). This was due to small reductions in step frequency (-1.8%; -1.7%) because of small increases in contact time (+2.7%; +1.5%) in both conditions and a small increase in flight time (+2.0%) in the shank-loaded condition. Both conditions led to moderate increases in hip extension at toe-off (+2.7 degrees; +1.4 degrees), whilst thigh loading led to a small reduction in peak hip flexion angle during swing (-2.5 degrees) and shank loading led to a small increase in peak biceps femoris muscle-tendon unit length (+0.4%). Thigh and shank loading can both be used to provide small reductions in sprint velocity, and each has specific overload effects which must be considered in the rationale for their implementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据