4.7 Article

A novel fluorescence probe for rapid and sensitive detection of tetracyclines residues based on silicon quantum dots

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2020.118463

关键词

Silicon quantum dots; Tetracyclines; Fluorescence probe; Chlortetracycline

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University [2018CDYJSY0055]
  2. Youth project of science and technology research program of Chongqing Education Commission of China [KJQN201804703]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019CDYGZD007]
  4. Sichuan Key Laboratory of China for Meat Processing [17-S-06]
  5. Chongqing Graduate Tutor Team Construction Project, Analytical and Testing Center of Chongqing University
  6. Chongqing University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel rapid and sensitive fluorescence probe based on silicon quantum dots (Si QDs) fluorescence was fabricated for selective detection of tetracyclines (TCs) residues. Si QDs were innovatively prepared via facile OnePot Solvent-FreeMethod and characterized by TEM, FT-IR, UV absorption, fluorescence, XPS and XRD. In aqueous solution, Cu2+ and Si QDs complexed together and the fluorescence of Si QDs quenched (static quenching) to a certain extent. TCs can be early in binding to Cu2+ and prevent Si QDs fluorescence quenching. As a consequence, quantitative screening of TCs can be achieved. The assay is highly selective for TCs. Represented by chlortetracycline (CTC), a member of TCs, under optimized conditions, good linear relationship in the range of 11.32-1086.72 nMwas obtained, and the detection limit (LOD; S/N ratio= 3) of this assay for CTC is 0.92 nM. It was successfully applied to the determination of CTC in spiked bee honey and total TCs in actual honey samples. And the evaluation of selectivity, reproducibility and stability of the probe were favorable. These results demonstrated that the presented fluorescent probe can be a promising sensing platform for TCs analysis. (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据