4.7 Article

Fluorescent MoS2 QDs based on IFE for turn-off determination of FOX-7 in real water samples

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2020.118131

关键词

MoS2 QDs; Fluorescence quenching; FOX-7; Quenching mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572127, 21576138, 51872140]
  2. Ph.D. Program Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20133219110018]
  3. Six Major Talent Summit [XNY-011]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20160828]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [1501016B]
  6. PAPD of Jiangsu Province, China
  7. [NCET-120629]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel method for turn-off sensing 1,1-diamino-22-dinitroethylene (FOX-7) in aqueous medium was first proposed based on the inner filter effect (WE) of FOX-7 on the fluorescence of molybdenum disulfide quantum dots (MoS2 QDs). Water-soluble MoS2 QDs as the fluorophore were prepared by the simple hydrothermal method. The morphology, structure, composition and optical properties of the prepared MoS2 QDs were characterized by Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), UV-vis absorption and photoluminescence spectra. The results showed that the MoS2 QDs had good water dispersibility and emitted strong photoluminescence with a partide size of 2 nm. Under the optimal experimental conditions, the fluorescence signal of MoS2 QDs was quenched in the concentrations range of FOX-7 (0.5-100 mu M) and the limit of detection (LOD) of the sensor was 0.19 mu M. The method had been applied to analyze the real water samples with good selectivity and stability. Moreover, the quenching mechanism was studied systematically by the Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), UV-vis absorption spectra, fluorescence lifetime, and Stem-Volmer equation, which had been proved to be static quenching. The fluorescence quenching mechanism is mainly IFE and electron transfer. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据