4.4 Article

Impacts of corn stover removal on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions

期刊

SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
卷 85, 期 5, 页码 1334-1348

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20104

关键词

-

资金

  1. Program of Energy Research and Development
  2. Natural Resources Canada
  3. Agriculture& Agri-Food Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the impacts of removing corn stover on soil-borne CO2 and N2O emissions, finding that stover removal may decrease CO2 emissions but increase N2O emissions, with different effects observed under different tillage practices.
Harvesting corn (Zea mays L.) stover for production of biofuels, industrial sugars, bioproducts, and livestock bedding is increasing rapidly, but little is known of the impacts of stover removal on soil-borne greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study evaluated the impacts of removing surface corn stover (0, 25, 50, 75, 100 wt. % removal) on carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from a sandy loam soil cropped to monoculture corn using conventional moldboard plow tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT). Stover removal systematically decreased CO2 emissions from CT, whereas stover removal had little effect on CO2 emissions from NT. In particular, the CT 0% stover removal treatment produced 47% greater CO2 emissions (5.75 Mg CO2-C ha(-1)) than the CT 100% removal (3.91 Mg CO2-C ha(-1)) treatment. Stover removal increased N2O emissions from both tillage treatments, producing up to a 75% increase under CT (2.79 kg N ha(-1) at 0% removal; 4.87 kg N ha(-1) at 100% removal) and up to a 95% increase under NT (1.75 kg N ha(-1) at 0% removal; 3.41 kg N ha(-1) at 100% removal). Cumulative nitrate exposure increased in comparable patterns to N2O emissions when stover residues were removed. There was a trade-off in GHG emissions resulting from stover removal under CT, whereby increasing stover removal reduced CO2 emissions but increased N2O emissions. In contrast, stover removal did not affect CO2 emissions under NT but it increased N2O emissions especially at the 100% removal rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据