4.8 Article

Selective Hysteretic Sorption of Light Hydrocarbons in a Flexible Metal-Organic Framework Material

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 28, 期 7, 页码 2331-2340

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00443

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Manchester
  2. University of Nottingham
  3. EPSRC [EP/I011870/1, EP/I020942/1, EP/P001386/1, EP/I011870/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I011870/1, EP/C528964/1, EP/I011870/2, EP/P001386/1, EP/I020942/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [1686291] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous MFM-202a (MFM = Manchester Framework Material, replacing the NOTT designation) shows an exceptionally high uptake of acetylene, 18.3 mmol g(-1) (47.6 wt %) at 195 K and 1.0 bar, representing the highest value reported to date for a framework material. However, at 293 K and 10 bar C2H6 uptake (9.13 mmol g(-1)) is preferred. Dual-site Langmuir-Freundlich (DSLF)- and Numerical Integration (NI)-based LAST methods have been used to analyze selectivities for C-1 to C-3 hydrocarbons. MFM-202a exhibits broadly hysteretic desorption of acetylene; such behavior is important for practical gas storage since it allows the gas to be adsorbed at high pressure but stored at relatively low pressure. Stepwise uptake and hysteretic release were also observed for adsorption of other unsaturated light hydrocarbons (ethane and propene) in MFM-202a but not for saturated hydrocarbons (methane, ethane, and propane). MFM-202a has been studied by in situ synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction to reveal the possible phase transition of the framework host as a function of gas loading. A comprehensive analysis for the selectivities between these light hydrocarbons has been conducted using both LAST calculation and dual-component mixed-gas adsorption experiments, and excellent agreement between theory and experiment was achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据