4.8 Article

Construction of Bimetallic Selenides Encapsulated in Nitrogen/Sulfur Co-Doped Hollow Carbon Nanospheres for High-Performance Sodium/Potassium-Ion Half/Full Batteries

期刊

SMALL
卷 16, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201907670

关键词

bimetallic selenides; full cells; potassium-ion batteries; sodium-ion batteries

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M652838, 2018M643041]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFF0204303]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21974032, 21805050, 21805052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metallic selenides have been widely investigated as promising electrode materials for metal-ion batteries based on their relatively high theoretical capacity. However, rapid capacity decay and structural collapse resulting from the larger-sized Na+/K+ greatly hamper their application. Herein, a bimetallic selenide (MoSe2/CoSe2) encapsulated in nitrogen, sulfur-codoped hollow carbon nanospheres interconnected reduced graphene oxide nanosheets (rGO@MCSe) are successfully designed as advanced anode materials for Na/K-ion batteries. As expected, the significant pseudocapacitive charge storage behavior substantially contributes to superior rate capability. Specifically, it achieves a high reversible specific capacity of 311 mAh g(-1) at 10 A g(-1) in NIBs and 310 mAh g(-1) at 5 A g(-1) in KIBs. A combination of ex situ X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy tests reveals the phase transition of rGO@MCSe in NIBs/KIBs. Unexpectedly, they show quite different Na+/K+ insertion/extraction reaction mechanisms for both cells, maybe due to more sluggish K+ diffusion kinetics than that of Na+. More significantly, it shows excellent energy storage properties in Na/K-ion full cells when coupled with Na3V2(PO4)(2)O2F and PTCDA@450 degrees C cathodes. This work offers an advanced electrode construction guidance for the development of high-performance energy storage devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据