4.8 Article

Role of Redox-Inactive Transition-Metals in the Behavior of Cation-Disordered Rocksalt Cathodes

期刊

SMALL
卷 16, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202000656

关键词

cation-disordered rocksalt cathodes; lithium-ion batteries; oxygen redox degradation mechanism; redox-inactive transition metals

资金

  1. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  2. DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Owing to the capacity boost from oxygen redox activities, Li-rich cation-disordered rocksalts (LRCDRS) represent a new class of promising high-energy Li-ion battery cathode materials. Redox-inactive transition-metal (TM) cations, typically d(0) TM, are essential in the formation of rocksalt phases, however, their role in electrochemical performance and cathode stability is largely unknown. In the present study, the effect of two d(0) TM (Nb5+ and Ti4+) is systematically compared on the redox chemistry of Mn-based model LRCDRS cathodes, namely Li1.3Nb0.3Mn0.4O2 (LNMO), Li1.25Nb0.15Ti0.2Mn0.4O2 (LNTMO), and Li1.2Ti0.4Mn0.4O2 (LTMO). Although electrochemically inactive, d(0) TM serves as a modulator for oxygen redox, with Nb5+ significantly enhancing initial charge storage contribution from oxygen redox. Further studies using differential electrochemical mass spectroscopy and resonant inelastic X-ray scattering reveal that Ti4+ is better in stabilizing the oxidized oxygen anions (O-n(-), 0 < n < 2), leading to a more reversible O redox process with less oxygen gas release. As a result, much improved chemical, structural and cycling stabilities are achieved on LTMO. Detailed evaluation on the effect of d(0) TM on degradation mechanism further suggests that proper design of redox-inactive TM cations provides an important avenue to balanced capacity and stability in this newer class of cathode materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据