4.7 Article

Correlation of high frequency QCM sphere-plate stiffness measurements with macroscopic frictional contacts in thin film and bulk stainless steel materials

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL
卷 306, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2020.111913

关键词

Friction; QCM; Cattaneo-Mindlin; Nanotribology; Contact mechanics

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [DMR1535082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compare friction coefficient values mu for stainless steel contacts, obtained directly using a ball on disk tribometer and/or a basic da Vinci method, with values inferred from two microscale analysis methods reported in the literature that treat the response of a Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) to rubbing contacts with one or more ball bearings. The microscale analysis methods both employ a Cattaneo-Mindlin slip scenario to relate contact stiffness to QCM response. Analysis Method 1 involves sweeps of the QCM amplitude of vibration while ball bearings are held in continuous contact with the oscillating electrode. It obtains mu from the slope of the associated frequency or bandwidth shift trace. We find that this method yields values for mu that compare favorably with macroscale values when the bandwidth dependence on vibrational amplitude is utilized. Method 2 obtains mu by analyzing the shifts in frequency and bandwidth that occur when ball bearings are brought in and out of contact with a QCM's oscillating electrode at a fixed vibrational amplitude. We find that this method yields values for mu that compare favorably with macroscale values when the measurements are performed with a contact comprised of 3 close-packed ball bearings situated symmetrically about the center of the QCM electrode. Overall, the results validate the combination of assumptions employed in the analysis methods, and support the methods as a viable means for linkage of macro and nanoscale tribological measurements. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据