4.6 Article

A Highly Sensitive Amperometric Glutamate Oxidase Microbiosensor Based on a Reduced Graphene Oxide/Prussian Blue Nanocube/Gold Nanoparticle Composite Film-Modified Pt Electrode

期刊

SENSORS
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s20102924

关键词

microbiosensor; glutamate; glutamate oxidase; Prussian blue nanocubes; chitosan; amperometry

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFE019550, 2017YFC1308501]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019QNA5027, K20200185]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31627802, 81571769]
  4. Zhejiang Laboratory [2018EB0ZX01]
  5. Zhejiang University Education Foundation Global Partnership Fund
  6. Zhejiang Province Key RD Programs [2018C01037, 2020C03039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple method that relies only on an electrochemical workstation has been investigated to fabricate a highly sensitive glutamate microbiosensor for potential neuroscience applications. In this study, in order to develop the highly sensitive glutamate electrode, a 100 mu m platinum wire was modified by the electrochemical deposition of gold nanoparticles, Prussian blue nanocubes, and reduced graphene oxide sheets, which increased the electroactive surface area; and the chitosan layer, which provided a suitable environment to bond the glutamate oxidase. The optimization of the fabrication procedure and analytical conditions is described. The modified electrode was characterized using field emission scanning electron microscopy, impedance spectroscopy, and cyclic voltammetry. The results exhibited its excellent sensitivity for glutamate detection (LOD = 41.33 nM), adequate linearity (50 nM-40 mu M), ascendant reproducibility (RSD = 4.44%), and prolonged stability (more than 30 repetitive potential sweeps, two-week lifespan). Because of the important role of glutamate in neurotransmission and brain function, this small-dimension, high-sensitivity glutamate electrode is a promising tool in neuroscience research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据