4.8 Article

Topochemically De-Intercalated Phases of V2O5 as Cathode Materials for Multivalent Intercalation Batteries: A First-Principles Evaluation

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 28, 期 16, 页码 5611-5620

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01006

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR 1504702, 1252521]
  2. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1504702] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The scarce inventory of compounds that allow for diffusion of multivalent cations at reasonable rates poses a major impediment to the development of multivalent intercalation batteries. Here, we contrast the thermodynamics and kinetics of the insertion of Li, Na, Mg, and Al ions in two synthetically accessible metastable phases of V2O5, zeta- and epsilon-V2O5, with the relevant parameters for the thermodynamically stable alpha-phase of V2O5 using density functional theory calculations. The metastability of the frameworks results in a higher open circuit voltage for multivalent ions, exceeding 3 V for Mg-ion intercalation. Multivalent ions inserted within these structures encounter suboptimal coordination environments and expanded transition states, which facilitate easier ion diffusion. Specifically, a nudged elastic band examination of ion diffusion pathways suggests that migration barriers are substantially diminished for Na- and Mg-ion diffusion in the metastable polymorphs: the predicted migration barriers for Mg ions in zeta-V2O5 and epsilon-V2O5 are 0.62-0.86 and 0.21-0.24 eV, respectively. More generally, the results indicate that topochemically derived metastable polymorphs represent an interesting class of compounds for realizing multivalent cation diffusion because many such compounds place cations in frustrated coordination environments that are known to be useful for realizing low diffusion barriers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据