4.3 Review

Controversies on the network theory of epilepsy: Debates held during the ICTALS 2019 conference

期刊

SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 78-85

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.03.010

关键词

Epileptic network; Ictogenesis; Epileptogenesis; Seizure control; Nodes; Edges

资金

  1. UCB S.A. (Belgium)
  2. American Epilepsy Society (AES)
  3. Epilepsy Innovation Institute (Ei2)
  4. Epilepsy Foundation of America (EFA)
  5. NeuraLynx (Bozeman, MT, USA)
  6. LivaNova (London, UK)
  7. National Institutes of Health [R01NS109062, R01 NS084142, R01 NS095368, R01 NS110669]
  8. EPSRC [EP/P021417/1, EP/N014391/1]
  9. Wellcome Trust [WT105618MA]
  10. Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic [AZV 17-28427A]
  11. Czech Science Foundation [20-25298S]
  12. EPSRC [EP/P021417/1, EP/N014391/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Debates on six controversial topics on the network theory of epilepsy were held during two debate sessions, as part of the International Conference for Technology and Analysis of Seizures, 2019 (ICTALS 2019) convened at the University of Exeter, UK, September 2-5 2019. The debate topics were (1) From pathologic to physiologic: is the epileptic network part of an existing large-scale brain network? (2) Are micro scale recordings pertinent for defining the epileptic network? (3) From seconds to years: do we need all temporal scales to define an epileptic network? (4) Is it necessary to fully define the epileptic network to control it? (5) Is controlling seizures sufficient to control the epileptic network? (6) Does the epileptic network want to be controlled? This article, written by the organizing committee for the debate sessions and the debaters, summarizes the arguments presented during the debates on these six topics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据