4.3 Article

DNA methylation and integrity in aged seeds and regenerated plants

期刊

SEED SCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 92-100

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0960258520000021

关键词

DNA methylation; epigenetics; Mentha aquatica; nucleic acid stability; seed ageing; seed storage

资金

  1. MINECO/FEDER [AGL2015-64899-C2-1-P]
  2. Programa Propio de I+D+I, UPM
  3. Programa BEC.AR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seed longevity is a complex process of key ecological and agronomic importance. DNA damage is a significant factor affecting seed ageing. Likewise, epigenetic changes can control gene expression and, therefore, seed response to ageing. The aim of the present work was to investigate the effect of ageing on nucleic acid stability and to identify reliable molecular markers that might help to monitor epigenetic changes within plant genetic resources during conservation. DNA profiles, evaluated by RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA), and methylation patterns, obtained by MSAP (methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism), were compared in non-aged and aged Mentha aquatica seeds and plants produced by them. Germination decreased to 50% by storing seeds at 35 degrees C and 12% wc for 28 days. RAPD profiles were 99% similar in these aged seeds compared to non-aged seeds. However, seedlings produced from the aged seeds showed a 13% dissimilarity compared to seedlings produced from the non-aged seeds. About 8% difference in the MSAP epigenetic profile was detected in seeds after storage and 16% difference was detected in the seedlings produced from them. This indicates that stress from high temperature and humidity during storage induced changes on the methylation state of seeds, and that changes were also detectable in the regenerated plants. Our results suggest that DNA integrity was compromised in seeds during ageing, and on seedlings produced by aged seeds. Genotype screening techniques such as RAPD and MSAP have the potential as markers of nucleic acid stability during seed ageing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据